[unknown individual]'s police notoriety [x]

Charlie · Post by **Charlie** » 26 Mar 2020, 00:59

+ File "Evidence" has been downloaded.
You found some evidence which implicates [unknown individual] in a crime. [unknown individual]'s police notoriety is currently reasonably low [0 points].
Fabricate further evidence to implicate them in other crimes?
Delete the evidence from law enforcement databases?
((Gained 52 exp))

Not sure if this is meant to happen.

Charlie · Post by **Charlie** » 26 Mar 2020, 00:59

+ You deleted evidence against the individual. Their notoriety dropped by 2 points.

Charlie · Post by **Charlie** » 26 Mar 2020, 01:01

And again.

+ File "Evidence" has been downloaded.
You found some evidence which implicates [unknown individual] in a crime. [unknown individual]'s police notoriety is currently reasonably low [0 points].
Fabricate further evidence to implicate them in other crimes?
Delete the evidence from law enforcement databases?
((Gained 46 exp))

+ You deleted evidence against the individual. Their notoriety dropped by 2 points.

C.S. & RP List · Post by **Alexandrea** » 29 Mar 2020, 17:22

That threw me at first as well, lol. But it's not a bug, it's what happens when there isn't anyone with any notoriety. So it's 'good news'. ;D

Kira · Post by **Kira** » 30 Mar 2020, 01:15

I was wondering about that. Mike had gotten it during hacking, half expecting his name on there because he couldn't get out of an B&E fight. <.<

Post by **Caligrace** » 30 Mar 2020, 17:52

Actually, there is a bug involved, then, because there have been people on the list with notoriety (some fairly high) and that's popped up when I've hacked.

C.S. & RP List · Post by **Alexandrea** » 30 Mar 2020, 17:59

Caligrace wrote:Actually, there is a bug involved, then, because there have been people on the list with notoriety (some fairly high) and that's popped up when I've hacked.

It was doing that when it was first implemented as well, I wonder what triggered it to start doing it again? & I've edited the O.P. subject to mark this a 'B'.

Cliff Worthington · Post by **Cliff Worthington** » 30 Mar 2020, 20:19

I'm wondering if its a measure put in place so if only one person is on the list, it'll prevent people from lowering the bounty super quick by adding some randomness to it.

Post by **Mooncalf** » 31 Mar 2020, 12:55

Yeah it's intentional. If there are only 1 or 2 people on the list and their notoriety is quite low then the chances of coming across evidence regarding an unknown individual is higher.

Post by **Caligrace** » 31 Mar 2020, 20:50

Ooh, that makes more sense, then. Thank you!

[unknown individual]'s police notoriety [x]

[unknown individual]'s police notoriety [x]

Re: [unknown individual]'s police notoriety

Re: [unknown individual]'s police notoriety

Re: [unknown individual]'s police notoriety

Re: [unknown individual]'s police notoriety [x]

Re: [unknown individual]'s police notoriety [x]

Re: [unknown individual]'s police notoriety [x]

Re: [unknown individual]'s police notoriety [B]

Re: [unknown individual]'s police notoriety [B]

Re: [unknown individual]'s police notoriety [x]