Questions wrt Crownet Under New Management

[Deirdre (DELETED 5847)]

#hacker4lyfebro

Deirdre, too! Haha. This could be fun...

[Cassandra]

I'd be okay with using dice rolls and that to try and figure it out based on stats.
I just think at some point there should be the option, since I agree with what Rain says. They kinda hack a lot, all day, every day.
Gotta get lucky some time?

The option's already there. All it requires is getting with the other player and making it collaborative.

[Prudence]

Right.
Which would be...david in this situation.
Or at least his okay. A plot like this needs his approval.

D:

[Jonah]

Unfounded guess: The Admin identity/history will be found out in a hacking raid.

[Marjani (DELETED 5749)]

So, out of curiosity, since it's 'anonymous,' what about the rule of 'attacking' what someone posts with two characters.
Or, in my case, wanting to disagree with a poster with two different characters (but haven't due to that rule).

>.>

Attacking is a bit of a strong word in my case, but you get the gist of what I mean and where I'm going.

>.>

[Remington Rothfelder]

You still know who the people are OOC.

[Marjani (DELETED 5749)]

Yeah, I do. But does it come to OOC or IC in the old instance?
>.>

S'what my thought was.

And then so I can't have, say...Prudence, Ric and idk whoever else post disagreeing with the Administrator?

I hate to be that person, but I'm sure I can't be the only person who has wondered this since the new annon thing cropped up. And I'd rather spare people warnings and such ahead of time.

:)

[Pi dArtois]

The way I see it, the rule applies in the same way. You still cannot back up your other characters. The update is IC, the rule is an OOC mechanic applied to the IC actions, which isn't impacted by this update.

Because we can still see you (in an OOC sense) do that with your character on crownet.

[Marjani (DELETED 5749)]

I wasn't saying backing up.
I was saying, say Mari doesn't agree with something phoenix posts.
And neither does Ric, and neither back up the other, they just don't agree.
That's what I was talking about.

>.>

[Pi dArtois]

Which can be construed as backing up, depending on context.

I think you face the same danger in running afoul of the rule, and use the same judgment as you would when deciding if your statements written for one character could be seen to be backing up another, even if the content isn't backing up 'each other'.

This update doesn't change that decision you make as a player. Or the decision of other players if they report. Just be mindful of the potential. Personally, I think you'll be fine, but we don't control how the player base chooses to report.

And really, it is depends on context, which can be very subjective.