Page 2 of 103
Re: Canon Q&A With David
Posted: 19 Nov 2012, 00:18
by Alexandrea
Yes, I recall reading that somewhere before...
Re: Canon Q&A With David
Posted: 19 Nov 2012, 00:19
by Mooncalf
Alexandrea wrote:
What physical reactions would she experiences that would be different from human ones? I understand they grow at a faster rate.
And what sort of damage are we talking about that she would suffer when it was born (talking stat wise here, I get the whole ripped to heck idea) and can that be done on grid to reflect what happened? If I was to have her 'die' from the event, would have have to find another way to send her to the sr? Even if I had someone summon a fadebeast npc, that isn't going to kill her and would rather her 'death wound' was accurate.
That's all something I'll leave up to individual roleplayers to decide. As I've said, they gestate within a couple of months, and they rip a gaping hole right through their mothers. They also often kill their mother, which could explain the death thing if you wanna play that.
As for her death wound being accurate, you'll just have to use your imaginations I guess? The grid is just a reflection of the roleplay, not the other way around.
Re: Canon Q&A With David
Posted: 19 Nov 2012, 00:21
by Alexandrea
Mooncalf wrote:Alexandrea wrote:
As for her death wound being accurate, you'll just have to use your imaginations I guess? The grid is just a reflection of the roleplay, not the other way around.
oh poo, lol. :-*
Re: Canon Q&A With David
Posted: 19 Nov 2012, 00:29
by Mooncalf
No chatter on this thread please, just Q&A.
Re: Canon Q&A With David
Posted: 19 Nov 2012, 00:42
by Monique (DELETED 725)
*points back a page to her skipped question >.>*
Re: Canon Q&A With David
Posted: 20 Nov 2012, 10:00
by Moriah
Monique wrote:On the fadebeasts and vampire pregnancy thing - If a vampire was sterile as a mortal either naturally or via some sort of surgery, does that continue to hold true for them as a vampire?
Quoting it for David >.> Because I've been curious too.
My question: I don't remember much about what we agreed on regarding CCTV and photo evidence of vamps. This is more a "refresh my memory" request: did we agree that photos, or types of visual-capture that involve reflection wouldn't work on vamps, but digital cameras would? And if that is true, in the case of an "invisible" vamp on film, would it just look like a bunch of floating clothes, or would it be an empty space that moves things/fights?
Re: Canon Q&A With David
Posted: 20 Nov 2012, 13:46
by Temperance Avila
Mooncalf wrote:
Fadebeats are one of the only creatures who can jump between realms very easily, as they exist more in the shadow realm than they do in the real world. As such, many of these fadebeasts have simply escaped the shadow realm, and have been there for hundreds of years.
If they exist more in the shadow realm (granted many have escaped), why have we not seen any there?
ETA: Another question:
Crossing bridges to other paths should only give the vampire the ability to learn powers, not the other features that a pure path vampire has? i.e. A Killer entering Allurist will not de-age or be able to hold down food. A Telepath entering Mystic will not return from the realm as a different form to jump into a new body.
Re: Canon Q&A With David
Posted: 21 Nov 2012, 15:34
by Keara Aithne
Q1. Is it possible for vampires not born into the path of the Allurist to drink alcohol?
If the answer to question 1 is 'yes' than ignore the following questions. If the answer is 'no' please answer the following too:
Q2. Is it possible to engineer drinks that can be consumable by all vampires, regardless of their path?
If the answer to question 2 is 'yes' than ignore the next question. If the answer is 'no' please answer the following too:
Q3. All vampires not born into the path of the Allurist can ONLY drink blood.
Re: Canon Q&A With David
Posted: 21 Nov 2012, 16:05
by Mooncalf
Monique wrote:On the fadebeasts and vampire pregnancy thing - If a vampire was sterile as a mortal either naturally or via some sort of surgery, does that continue to hold true for them as a vampire?
Sorry, I must have missed this.
Nope, mortal sterility does not prevent fadebeast conception.
Re: Canon Q&A With David
Posted: 21 Nov 2012, 16:06
by Mooncalf
Moriah wrote:
My question: I don't remember much about what we agreed on regarding CCTV and photo evidence of vamps. This is more a "refresh my memory" request: did we agree that photos, or types of visual-capture that involve reflection wouldn't work on vamps, but digital cameras would? And if that is true, in the case of an "invisible" vamp on film, would it just look like a bunch of floating clothes, or would it be an empty space that moves things/fights?
No, all cameras and film can pick up vampires, digital or otherwise. It's only reflections which don't work for them. In a mirror, even their clothing is invisible.