Canon Q&A With Storytellers

Ask as many questions as you need and get help from our friendly community. New to the site? Come say hi here!
Post Reply
Ambrose Acheron
Registered User
Posts: 376
Joined: 19 Jun 2015, 14:20
CrowNet Handle: The Smoking Mirror
Location: Harper Rock
Contact:

Re: Canon Q&A With Stortellers

Post by Ambrose Acheron »

So birth control now works? Cause David said they did not work before.

There's a huge contradiction in there somewhere. That's what I am trying to figure out.
Image
Occepa iuhcan yez, occeppa iuh tlamaniz, in iquin, in canin.
User avatar
Pi dArtois
Registered User
Posts: 4270
Joined: 19 Aug 2011, 19:13
CrowNet Handle: Pi

Re: Canon Q&A With Stortellers

Post by Pi dArtois »

You're right, David has said in the past that protection doesn't work to protect against having a fadebabeh, however, my interpretation has been that not every sexual encounter results in one.

Just that every sexual encounter has the potential to create one, even if you use protection. Protection being no barrier against the potential. (ie: Dice roller rules all things)
K I L L E R || E L L I O T ' S
Image
CANIDAE || d'ARTOIS
Azraeth
Registered User
Posts: 3777
Joined: 14 May 2011, 03:41
CrowNet Handle: serpent_melech

Re: Canon Q&A With Stortellers

Post by Azraeth »

I went ahead and poked David to take a look at the questions. In the meantime:

1) Go with the previous stated 1:1000 ratio.
2) Assume 'protection' applies to all preventative measures. Making a Fadebeast requires sperm and egg, so it makes sense there would be some potential to block conception if the partners involved made an effort. Similarly, a condom isn't a 100% guarantee that a baby won't be conceived, or the parties involved won't get an STD. Because Fadebeasts are part spirit and part flesh, those preventative measures would be even less effective. It's not really a contradiction, just a different way of looking at the provided information.
3) I wouldn't look too hard at the Fadebeast thing because honestly, it's not entirely supposed to make sense.
Image
I'LL USE YOU AS A WARNING SIGN THAT IF YOU TALK ENOUGH SENSE THEN YOU'LL LOSE YOUR MIND
newbie links :
( path story intro )
( beginner guide )
( exp tips )
User avatar
Noemi Michaux
Registered User
Posts: 167
Joined: 07 Feb 2016, 03:03
CrowNet Handle: Urbanshee

Re: Canon Q&A With Stortellers

Post by Noemi Michaux »

could be a lucrative business for an enterprising vampiric scientist, fadebeast contraceptives lol
Noemi Michaux Dangeau - Childe of Ambrose - House Acheron
Image
Die? Oh such a limited imagination
Jedediah
Registered User
Posts: 255
Joined: 13 Aug 2015, 02:46

Re: Canon Q&A With Stortellers

Post by Jedediah »

all you need is a mystic with small hands
Image
Ambrose Acheron
Registered User
Posts: 376
Joined: 19 Jun 2015, 14:20
CrowNet Handle: The Smoking Mirror
Location: Harper Rock
Contact:

Re: Canon Q&A With Stortellers

Post by Ambrose Acheron »

Yay Teleport 2!
Image
Occepa iuhcan yez, occeppa iuh tlamaniz, in iquin, in canin.
User avatar
Noemi Michaux
Registered User
Posts: 167
Joined: 07 Feb 2016, 03:03
CrowNet Handle: Urbanshee

Re: Canon Q&A With Stortellers

Post by Noemi Michaux »

omgawd Jed PMSL!!!!!
Noemi Michaux Dangeau - Childe of Ambrose - House Acheron
Image
Die? Oh such a limited imagination
User avatar
Trahir Trahison
Registered User
Posts: 762
Joined: 16 Apr 2015, 19:09
CrowNet Handle: Ahab
Location: Looking over your shoulder

Re: Canon Q&A With Stortellers

Post by Trahir Trahison »

Azraeth wrote:I went ahead and poked David to take a look at the questions. In the meantime:

1) Go with the previous stated 1:1000 ratio.
2) Assume 'protection' applies to all preventative measures. Making a Fadebeast requires sperm and egg, so it makes sense there would be some potential to block conception if the partners involved made an effort. Similarly, a condom isn't a 100% guarantee that a baby won't be conceived, or the parties involved won't get an STD. Because Fadebeasts are part spirit and part flesh, those preventative measures would be even less effective. It's not really a contradiction, just a different way of looking at the provided information.
3) I wouldn't look too hard at the Fadebeast thing because honestly, it's not entirely supposed to make sense.
Condoms = 98% effective according to the CDC.

That means they are actually over 10x more effective for vampires given the ratio of 1:1000.

There's a problem there somewhere logically.
Tribulation brings enlightenment...
Image
User avatar
Levi DAmico
Registered User
Posts: 961
Joined: 12 Jun 2014, 13:22
CrowNet Handle: Incognito

Re: Canon Q&A With Stortellers

Post by Levi DAmico »

Though all Wraiths on the Grid are reported as Shadows, it is logical to assume that they might have been a Telepath or Allurtist, or whatever when they were Vampires. Right?

So, you could therefore assume that your Wraith could give you knowledge of their former path?

Image
telepath | mystic | SHADOW | necromancer | killer | allurist
| Character Sheet |
| OOC: Claire |
Azraeth
Registered User
Posts: 3777
Joined: 14 May 2011, 03:41
CrowNet Handle: serpent_melech

Re: Canon Q&A With Stortellers

Post by Azraeth »

Levi DAmico wrote:Though all Wraiths on the Grid are reported as Shadows, it is logical to assume that they might have been a Telepath or Allurtist, or whatever when they were Vampires. Right?

So, you could therefore assume that your Wraith could give you knowledge of their former path?
I don't see why either of those would be a problem, assuming the wraith is coherent enough to pass along that knowledge. It would also depend largely on the wraith's history. A person turned and killed shortly thereafter wouldn't have much knowledge of their path.

My only real caveat is that they obviously wouldn't unlock a person's path the way a wraith guide does, as wraith guides are exceptionally powerful wraiths. Otherwise, go for it.
Image
I'LL USE YOU AS A WARNING SIGN THAT IF YOU TALK ENOUGH SENSE THEN YOU'LL LOSE YOUR MIND
newbie links :
( path story intro )
( beginner guide )
( exp tips )
Post Reply